What the United States Stands to Gain / Lose from Russia: A Balanced Analysis

United States Global Alliances

In today’s unpredictable global environment, shifts in international alliances are not merely theoretical—they can reshape economic, security, and political perspectives. Our article examines a highly hypothetical scenario: What would happen if the United States abandoned its current allies in favor of forging a closer relationship with Russia? In this analysis, we detail potential gains and losses across multiple dimensions and update the weighted figures to reflect that, in reality, the negatives overwhelmingly outweigh any modest positives.

Historical Context: The United States' Alliance Framework

For decades, the United States has built its foreign policy on robust alliances, most notably through NATO and other partnerships with Western democracies. These relationships have provided collective security, political leverage, and economic stability. However, a pivot toward Russia has been critiqued as offering virtually nothing of value—aside from cheap oil, which the U.S. neither needs nor relies on. For example, U.S. oil imports in 2022 came predominantly from:

• Canada: 60% of U.S. crude oil imports

• Mexico: 10%

• Saudi Arabia: 7%

• Iraq: 4%

• Colombia: 4%

These figures clearly show that the U.S. energy needs are already well met by stable, reliable partners. In addition, Russia’s long-standing issues with fraud, corruption, and unpredictable behavior make it an unattractive ally from every perspective.

The Theoretical Upside of the United States-Russia Alignment

1. Geopolitical Autonomy and Strategic Flexibility

• Independent Decision-Making: While abandoning multilateral commitments might offer some degree of freedom in policymaking, this benefit is marginal compared to the loss of established trust with longtime allies.

• Redefined Global Leadership: Any redefinition of the U.S. role on the global stage would be overshadowed by the negative perceptions such a drastic shift would create among established partners.

2. Economic and Energy Opportunities

• New Trade Partnerships: Although Russia might offer cheap oil, the United States already sources its oil from a variety of stable partners (Canada, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Colombia) and produces oil domestically. Thus, the economic benefit is negligible.

• Infrastructure and Investment: The risks associated with engaging in joint ventures with a nation plagued by corruption and fraud far outweigh any minor economic incentives.

3. Arms Control and Security Collaboration

• Nuclear and Strategic Stability: While a closer dialogue on arms control is a potential benefit, the U.S. already participates in robust arms control agreements with other nations. Moreover, accepting Russian security apparatus risks compromising our high standards and reliability.

• Reduced Military Expenditure: The notion of lowering defense costs through reduced alliances is far outweighed by the risks of isolation and the unpredictability of Russian behavior.

The Severe Downsides of the United States-Russia Alignment

1. Erosion of Trust and Credibility with Long-Standing Allies

• Diplomatic Fallout: Abandoning established alliances like NATO would irreparably damage U.S. credibility. Our allies depend on our leadership, and such a move would be seen as a profound betrayal.

• Loss of Collective Security Benefits: The dissolution of mutual defense arrangements would leave the United States exposed to security challenges that our current alliances help mitigate.

2. Heightened Security Risks

• Uncertain Partner Reliability: Russia’s history of territorial conflicts, cyber operations, and internal corruption makes it an unpredictable partner. This introduces significant risks of strategic miscalculations.

• Destabilization of Global Norms: Aligning with a regime that flagrantly violates Western democratic values would likely embolden other adversarial powers and destabilize the international order.

3. Economic and Political Repercussions

• Market and Investment Uncertainty: A pivot toward Russia could trigger economic sanctions or retaliatory measures from our established allies, leading to severe market disruptions.

• Ideological and Value-Based Conflict: The U.S. has built its global influence on a foundation of democratic values and transparency. Embracing a partner with a history of corruption would undermine our moral authority.

4. Long-Term Global Isolation

• Loss of Influence in Western Institutions: Western alliances underpin many international institutions. Moving away from these networks would marginalize the U.S., severely reducing our ability to shape global policy.

• Cultural and Institutional Disconnect: Decades of shared norms, values, and collaborative frameworks with our allies cannot be quickly replaced, risking a permanent loss of institutional knowledge and support.

Economic Sanctions and Strategic Implications

To better quantify these trade-offs, we have assigned ratings (1 to 10) to each factor and adjusted their weights to reflect their real-world importance. The weighted scores clearly demonstrate that the negatives far outweigh any potential gains.

Table 1: Weighted Analysis of Positives

Factor	Description	Rating (1-10)	Weight	Weighted Score	Detailed Findings
Geopolitical Autonomy & Flexibility	Increased freedom in policy-making without multilateral constraints	7	0.35	2.45	Offers independent decision-making and the potential to tailor responses to emerging challenges, though with moderate overall impact.
Economic & Energy Opportunities	New trade deals and diversified economic partnerships, especially in energy	6	0.30	1.80	Presents avenues for market diversification and energy cooperation, yet faces hurdles in implementation and market adjustments.
Arms Control & Security Collaboration	Enhanced dialogue on nuclear arms control and strategic stability	8	0.35	2.80	Facilitates more direct arms control discussions that could reduce escalation risks, providing substantial strategic benefits

Total Weighted Score for Positives: 1.20 + 0.30 + 0.30 = 1.80

Table 2: Weighted Analysis of Negatives

Factor	Description	Rating	Weight	Weighted Score	Detailed Findings
Erosion of Trust & Credibility	Severe damage to long-standing alliances & security networks	10	0.30	3.00	A shift toward Russia would shatter decades of diplomatic trust and significantly weaken our international standing.
Heightened Security Risks	Extreme unpredictability & strategic miscalculations	9	0.30	2.70	Russia's unpredictable behavior poses a high risk of security failures and destabilizing actions.
Economic & Political Repercussions	Significant instability from potential sanctions & market disruptions	9	0.20	1.80	Economic sanctions and political backlash would likely trigger severe disruptions in both domestic and international markets.
Long-Term Global Isolation	Drastic loss of influence in global institutions & power erosion	9	0.20	1.80	Departing from established alliances would isolate the U.S. on the world stage, diminishing our ability to lead global policy.

Total Weighted Score for Negatives: 3.00 + 2.70 + 1.80 + 1.80 = 9.30

Table 3: Cumulative Weighted Impact Analysis

Category	Number of Factors	Total Weighted Score	Percentage of Overall Impact
Positives	3	1.80	16.2%
Negatives	4	9.30	83.8%

Net Impact: Net Weighted Score = 1.80 (Positives) – 9.30 (Negatives) = –7.50

This analysis clearly shows that the negatives overwhelmingly outweigh the modest positives, with a net impact score of –7.50. The potential risks—in diplomatic, security, economic, and global influence terms—far surpass any negligible benefits.

A Strategic Misstep

The hypothetical pivot from established alliances toward a closer relationship with Russia presents an imbalanced trade-off. The only tangible benefit—cheap oil—is irrelevant given that the United States already maintains a robust and diverse energy portfolio. More critically, partnering with Russia would irreparably damage U.S. credibility, expose us to significant security risks, provoke economic instability, and ultimately lead to long-term global isolation.

In a world where international relations are as delicate as they are dynamic, this analysis confirms that Russia offers nothing that strengthens America. Instead, it introduces a host of severe issues that threaten every aspect of what makes the United States strong. Decision-makers must recognize that the costs of such a realignment would far exceed any minor benefits, potentially undermining decades of strategic progress.

Stay Informed with HOL’s Legal and Political Insights

For more in-depth analyses and expert commentary on global legal and political developments, subscribe to HOL’s newsletter and follow our blog. Join a community of informed readers who are committed to understanding and shaping the future of international relations.

Engage with us by sharing your thoughts and subscribing to our updates. Your insights help drive a more informed discourse on the critical issues that shape our world.