PROTECTING THE INTEGRITY OF AMERICAN ELECTIONS UNDER PRESIDENT TRUMP
- The House of Law, P.C. Attorneys & Counselors
- 1 day ago
- 4 min read
Federal Voter Registration Laws: Understanding NVRA, HAVA, and Election Integrity
Fair and accessible elections are paramount to American democracy. Federal laws significantly influence how citizens register to vote and how elections are managed. On March 25th, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14248, “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections,” which directs the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to take necessary steps to mandate documentary proof of U.S. citizenship in its national mail voter registration form. This article examines two fundamental laws – the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) – along with recent developments related to election integrity.
The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA): Expanding Voter Access During Elections
Often called the "Motor Voter Law," the NVRA aimed to increase voter registration nationwide while ensuring voter lists remain accurate. It established federal minimum standards for states in federal elections.
Key NVRA Election Provisions:
Multiple Registration Opportunities: States must offer voter registration through:
Allowing simultaneous registration when applying for or renewing driver's licenses/IDs (unless opted out). Change of address forms also update voter registration.
States must accept the federal mail-in form, which cannot require notarization and only asks for necessary information.
Voter List Maintenance Rules:
Registration deadlines cannot be more than 30 days before a federal election.
States must notify applicants about their registration status.
Specific procedures must be followed to maintain accurate lists (e.g., removing voters due to death or moving out of jurisdiction after notice).
Voters cannot be removed solely for failing to vote.
"Fail-safe" voting options must be available for registered voters who moved within the same jurisdiction.
Record Keeping & Oversight:
States must keep registration records for two years (publicly available, with privacy exceptions) and designate a chief election official. The Department of Justice enforces the NVRA.
(*6 states are exempt from NVRA due to pre-existing same-day/no reg. laws. U.S. territories are not covered.)
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002: Setting Election Integrity Standards
Enacted after the 2000 election challenges, HAVA aimed to modernize the voting process by setting minimum standards for election administration and providing federal funding.
Key HAVA Election Provisions:
Minimum Election Standards:
Established requirements for voting systems and accessibility.
Election Assistance Commission (EAC):
Created the EAC to assist states with HAVA compliance, distribute funds, set voting system guidelines, certify voting systems, and maintain the National Voter Registration Form.
Updated Mail-In Form:
Added questions confirming U.S. citizenship and age (18 by election day), with warnings against false applications.
ID for First-Time Mail-In Voters:
Requires individuals who registered by mail and are voting for the first time in a federal election in that state to present ID (photo ID or document like a utility bill showing name/address), with certain exceptions. Provisional ballots are offered if ID is required but not presented.
Statewide Database Coordination:
Mandates states coordinate their voter registration databases with state felony and death records to improve list accuracy.
Recent Actions and the Ongoing Election Integrity Debate
Discussions around voter registration and election security continue, involving executive actions, proposed legislation, and legal battles.
Key Recent Developments:
Executive Order Focus: A recent Presidential Executive Order aimed to tighten election security by:
Considering proof of citizenship requirements for the federal mail-in form.
Requiring checks on citizenship status at public assistance agencies offering registration.
Providing state officials access to federal databases for citizenship verification.
Directing federal reviews of state voter lists against immigration data.
Coordinating federal and state efforts on prosecuting non-citizen voting.
Potentially tying EAC funding to states meeting specific ballot receipt deadlines.
Legislative Proposals (SAVE Act):
The House passed the SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship to register for federal elections and mandate states remove non-citizens from rolls. Its passage in the Senate is uncertain.
The Executive Order faced immediate lawsuits arguing the President overstepped constitutional authority regarding federal elections.
A federal judge temporarily blocked parts of the Executive Order, specifically the attempts to add a proof of citizenship requirement to the federal form and mandate citizenship checks by federal agencies offering registration, citing likely overreach of presidential authority.
The Proof of Citizenship Controversy:
Arguments Against:
Critics argue proof of citizenship requirements disenfranchise eligible citizens lacking required documents and that non-citizen voting is extremely rare.
Arguments For:
Proponents assert such measures are necessary for election integrity and align with practices in other countries.
Balancing Access and Security to Ensure Election Integrity
Foundation Laws:
Checks on Power:
Recent court actions highlight legal limitations on unilateral executive changes to federal election rules.
Ongoing Tension:
The debate over stricter requirements like proof of citizenship underscores the core tension between ensuring election security and guaranteeing the right to vote without excessive barriers.
EAC's Role:
The EAC remains a key agency for implementing federal election law, providing guidance and resources.
Future Outlook:
Legislative efforts like the SAVE Act indicate that debates and potential changes regarding federal voter registration requirements will likely continue.
The Ongoing Dialogue on Voter Access and Election Integrity
Understanding the intricacies of federal voter registration laws and the ongoing debates surrounding election integrity is essential for engaged citizens. The balance between ensuring secure and fair elections and maximizing voter participation remains a central theme in American democracy, and the laws and actions discussed in this article represent key milestones in this ongoing dialogue.
Comments